<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 1.0 Released!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/2004/11/firefox-10-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/2004/11/firefox-10-released/</link>
	<description>Can't believe I'm blogging ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xine</title>
		<link>http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/2004/11/firefox-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>xine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/?p=63#comment-63</guid>
		<description>thanks so much for the advice! i&#039;ll look into them for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks so much for the advice! i&#8217;ll look into them for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/2004/11/firefox-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 06:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/?p=63#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got some experience with 2 Canons, 1 Minolta, and 1 Sony digicam and have liked Canon&#039;s picture quality the best.  If size &amp; portability are the main factors, a cameraphone may be worth looking into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got some experience with 2 Canons, 1 Minolta, and 1 Sony digicam and have liked Canon&#8217;s picture quality the best.  If size &#038; portability are the main factors, a cameraphone may be worth looking into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksc</title>
		<link>http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/2004/11/firefox-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>ksc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/?p=63#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hey Christine,

Yeah, I have the perfect camera for you! :)  I love my Casio Exilim!  I have an EX-Z3 which is the older model and it&#039;s a 3 megapixel camera.  But they also have the newer models out now.  There&#039;s the EX-Z30, EX-Z40, and EX-Z50.  The differences are that they are the 3 megapixel, 4 megapixel, and 5 megapixel, respectively.  Anyway, the reason why I like this camera so much is because it&#039;s SO small and yet has a HUGE screen.  It&#039;s fast too.  It&#039;s about the size of a credit card (not thickness though ... that would be crazy!).  

It&#039;s a really decent price on it too.  There&#039;s a good site that I have bought digital cameras from and they are reliable and cheap.  It&#039;s ibuydigital.com. Do a search on these cameras and you&#039;ll find that the price is $208, $248, $294, all under $300.  

I have always been partial to Sony products, but I like the way these pictures turn out MUCH more than the Sony. 

Here&#039;s a DETAILED review of my camera (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/casioexz3/), although the one on ibuydigital would be the newer model.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Christine,</p>
<p>Yeah, I have the perfect camera for you! <img src='http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I love my Casio Exilim!  I have an EX-Z3 which is the older model and it&#8217;s a 3 megapixel camera.  But they also have the newer models out now.  There&#8217;s the EX-Z30, EX-Z40, and EX-Z50.  The differences are that they are the 3 megapixel, 4 megapixel, and 5 megapixel, respectively.  Anyway, the reason why I like this camera so much is because it&#8217;s SO small and yet has a HUGE screen.  It&#8217;s fast too.  It&#8217;s about the size of a credit card (not thickness though &#8230; that would be crazy!).  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a really decent price on it too.  There&#8217;s a good site that I have bought digital cameras from and they are reliable and cheap.  It&#8217;s ibuydigital.com. Do a search on these cameras and you&#8217;ll find that the price is $208, $248, $294, all under $300.  </p>
<p>I have always been partial to Sony products, but I like the way these pictures turn out MUCH more than the Sony. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a DETAILED review of my camera (<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/casioexz3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/casioexz3/</a>), although the one on ibuydigital would be the newer model.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine</title>
		<link>http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/2004/11/firefox-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyeschung.com/blog/?p=63#comment-60</guid>
		<description>hi pKye! do you know any affordable digital cameras for an average, not too high tech person? i&#039;m looking for one that&#039;s under $300, easy to use, and not too big. any advice would be appreciated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi pKye! do you know any affordable digital cameras for an average, not too high tech person? i&#8217;m looking for one that&#8217;s under $300, easy to use, and not too big. any advice would be appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
